More Roster Thoughts
I present a few thoughts up for discussion:
- Kwame Brown needs surgery for a torn pectoral muscle and is out until early April. The season ends April 26th. First this is disappointing because I liked what Kwame was bringing to the court. A lot more than what the starting center was bringing when he wasn’t hurt himself. MTII suggests that Ish Smith will be cut in order to bring in another big man. The inactive list does not open a roster position, but is there a way for the Warrior’s to declare Kwame inactive for the rest of the season and use his spot on the 15 man roster to pick up another player? Can they cut him? If so that is the route I would take as by the time he comes back and there is only 2 weeks left in the season, the playoffs will already be out of the question, so why tie up a valuable roster spot for two weeks of no-point basketball. This assumes everything goes smoothly. If he has a slight hiccup in his recovery then he won’t even be back until the playoffs and that is not happening.
- That Heat game was a lot of fun to watch. I missed the 3rd quarter, no biggie, and caught the end. I was thinking about going up to the game for my birthday (I guess I share it with Lacob), but figured the game would be the opposite of a good birthday present to myself. I was wrong.
- The Warrior’s beat the Heat and the National media hardly notices, the Clippers beat the Heat and suddenly they become valid players in the NBA Champion discussion. Pretty absurd. Now ignoring the Warriors win was probably the right move. Discuss it as a single game, but it probably had no larger meaning on the Warrior’s season. It may show that it is too early to anoint the Heat Champs, but does not mean that the Warriors are “for real.” In the same context the OT loss to the Clippers may also show that the Heat are going to have some trouble with high scoring teams on the road. The Clippers may or may not be real, but I don’t think we will look back at one OT win over the Heat and say, “That was when we knew.” The Heat losing to the Warriors the night before just proves that beating the Heat in your house is not a Herculean task.
- TK talks about the W’s upcoming decision on Steph Curry and offering a max contract which is about 5yr/$75M for $14.8M/yr average. “Among Curry’s 2009 class includes Blake Griffin (max obviously), James Harden (interesting) and Tyreke Evans (interesting).” I think all three of those players are better than Curry now and are likely to be in the long-term with the possible exception of Harden. As I have made clear I have soured a bit on Curry and do not see him as a future Super-star and a team can get into a lot of trouble giving max contracts to non-Super stars. I think he deserves something much closer to Monta’s 6 year $66M contract (Curry on the books for 6 years with his injury history scares the hell out of me though). It may be max or nothing, and I would lean towards max, but maybe he needs to be traded once he can show his ankle won’t fall apart every three games and sell high.
- File this in whatever … but the Raiders move to fire Hugh Jackson was probably the right call. Just as we did not blame Lacob for wanting to start afresh and fire Keith Smart, I don’t blame McKenzie for wanting to start fresh with his own guy. Plus Hue Jackson gambled on the Palmer trade and did not make the playoffs. I think he needed to make the playoffs for that trade to be worth it and therefore save his job. The Raider’s have no draft picks in the first three rounds this year, so the rebuild is going to take several years. If I were GM I would trade anyone, including Run-DMC if I can get picks in the first two rounds and get the rebuild happening one year sooner. Yes, the Raiders can possibly make the playoffs with the same team next year, but I don’t see them getting very far. That being said San Diego is still a better team and they may figure out how to play 16 games at some point so it is no guarantee the Raiders are a playoff team.